DNC - Consent to Call Monitoring

Forget Password?

Home | Site Map | Contact

FAQs

Company

Events

+	Regulatory News

+	Regulatory Charts

Prepared by Copilevitz & Canter, LLC - (816) 472-9000 | This chart is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.

Consent to Call Monitoring
Jurisdiction	Consent Required	Statutory Citation
Federal	One party	18 U.S.C. § 2511.
Alabama	One party	Ala. Code § 13A-11-30.
Alaska	One party	Alaska Stat. § 42.20.300 et seq.
Arizona	One party	ARS § 13-3001 et seq.
Arkansas	One party	Ark. Stat. § 5-60-120 et seq.
California	Two party consent if communication is confidential¹	Cal. Pen. Code § 632.
Colorado	One party	CRS 18-9-301 et seq.
Connecticut	All parties	Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-570d(a).
Delaware	One party	11 Del. C. § 2402.
D.C.	One party	D.C. Code § 23-541 et seq.
Florida	Two party consent with business exemption	Fla. Stat. § 934.03(d).
Georgia	One party	O.C.G.A § 16-11-60 et seq.
Hawaii	One party	HRS Stat. § 803-41 et seq.
Idaho	One party	Idaho Code § 18-6701 et seq.
Illinois	One party	720 ILCS 5/14-3(j).
Indiana	One party	Indiana Code Ann. § 35-33.5-1-5 et seq.
Iowa	One party	Iowa Code § 808B.1 et seq.
Kansas	One party	K.S.A. § 21-4001.
Kentucky	One party	KY Rev. Stat. § 526.010.
Louisiana	Two party	La. Gen. Ord. R-27021 V.A.6 La. R.S. 15:1301 et seq.
Maine	One party	15 M.R.S. § 709.
Maryland	Two party with business exemption	Md. Code Ann. § 10-401(4).
Massachusetts	Two party with business exemption	Mass. Ann. Laws Ch. 272 § 99.
Michigan	All parties	Mich. Penal Code 750.539c²
Minnesota	One party	Minn. Stat. § 626A.01 et seq.
Mississippi	One party	Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-501 et seq.
Missouri	One party	Mo. Stat. § 542.400 et seq.
Montana	All parties	Mont. Code § 45-8-213
Nebraska	One party	R.R.S. Neb. § 86-701 et seq.
Nevada	Two party	N.R.S. Ann. § 200.620.
New Hampshire	Two party with business exemption	New Hampshire Stat. § 570-A:1(IV).
New Jersey	One party	N.J. Stat. § 2A:156A-2 et seq.
New Mexico	One party	N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-12-1 et seq.
New York	One party	N.Y. CLS CPL § 700.05.
North Carolina	One party	N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-286 et seq.
North Dakota	One party	N.D. Cent. Ann. § 12.1-15-04.
Ohio	One party	ORC Ann. § 2933.51 et seq.
Oklahoma	One party	13 Okl. St. § 176.2 et seq.
Oregon	One party	ORS § 165.540 et seq.
Pennsylvania	Two party with business exemption	18 Pa. C.S. § 5704(15).
Puerto Rico	No Law	N/A
Rhode Island	One party	R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21(c).
South Carolina	One party	South Carolina Stat. § 16-17-470.
South Dakota	One party	S.D. Codified Laws § 22-21-1 et seq.
Tennessee	One party	Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-601.
Texas	One party	Tx. Penal Code § 16.02.
Utah	One party	Utah Code § 77-23a-4(7)(b)
Vermont	No State Law	N/A
Virginia	One party	Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-61 et seq.
Washington	Two party with business exemption	Rev. Code Wash. Stat. § 9.73.030.
West Virginia	One party	W. Va. Code § 62-1D-2 et seq.
Wisconsin	One party	Wis. Stat. § 968.27 et seq.
Wyoming	One party	Wyo. Stat. § 7-3-601 et seq.

¹ "Confidential communication" includes any communication in any circumstance in which the parties may reasonably expect that the communication not be overheard or recorded. Cal. Pen. Code § 632(c). Further, a California court has held that “held that calls made by a caller located outside the state, in this case Georgia, are still subject to California law because the principal purpose of that law is "to protect the privacy of confidential communications of California residents while they are California." Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, 2006 Cal. LEXIS 8362, at *52-53 (Cal. 2006).
² See Sullivan v. Gray, 117 Mich. App. 476 (1982) for interpretation of statute.

20070216